|
||||||||||||
|
SB 117 FINALIZED – THE END OF MUNICIPAL CABLE REGULATION IN OHIO On Monday, June 25, 2007, Ohio Governor Ted Strickland signed Senate Bill 117. Last week the Ohio Senate unanimously agreed to amendments made to SB 117 by the Ohio House Utilities Committee and passed by the full House on June 12, 2007. SB 117 will become law on September 23, 2007. While the final version of SB 117 is an improvement over the bill as introduced, it will still have a significant negative impact on municipalities, townships and school districts that have relied on local franchises for franchise fees and in-kind services from cable operators in exchange for the operators’ use of the public right-of-way. SB 117 will add Sections 1332.21 through 1332.34 to the Ohio Revised Code for video service authorization. In addition, the bill repeals Sections 505.90 through 505.92 (authorizing townships to enter into cable franchises) and amends Section 153.64 (with respect to township franchising authority). Here is a brief summary of SB 117 as passed by both houses. This summary should not be a substitute for a closer analysis of SB117 as it applies to your community.
Franchise Fee or
“Video Service Provider Fee” – SB 117 provides for quarterly
payments to local governments of up to 5% of gross revenues, but
limits the definition of gross revenues to include only subscriber
revenues and advertising revenues (but only if the community
specifies in an ordinance or resolution). Local governments must
give new providers notice of the percentage, or forfeit the right to
fees. Many communities will see significantly lower payments from
video providers. Provider Fee (Franchise Fee)
Audits – SB 117 significantly impairs local
governments' ability to
audit a provider’s payment of fees. Fees may be audited for the
preceding two-year period but solely at the local government’s
expense – no matter how great the underpayment. If the audit reveals
an underpayment of fees that the operator disputes in whole or in
part, the local government must file suit to recover the fees. Local
governments cannot enter into “contingency” payment arrangements for
the audit of franchise fees. Free Services for
Public Benefit – Local governments can no longer require
operators to provide free cable service to government, school and
library buildings as cable franchises have traditionally required.
Any Institutional Network (I-Net)
obligations in a franchise effective on January 1, 2007 are
“grandfathered” until the expiration of the franchise or January 1,
2012 – whichever comes first. A
video service provider must give 120 days notice of its intention to
terminate the provision of an I-Net. Public,
Educational and Governmental (PEG) Access Channels and Support. Communities with 3 or more PEG access channels as of January 1, 2007 may keep those channels and any new provider must provide the same number of channels. The provider must carry 3 channels on the lowest, most frequently viewed tier. Any channels over 3 may be carried on a higher, digital tier and may be reclaimed by the provider if the channels are not “substantially utilized”. If a community has 2 PEG access channels on January 1, 2007, one of those channels must be on the lowest tier while the other channel may be on a higher tier. Communities without existing PEG access channels may require service providers to provide up to 2 or 3 PEG channels, depending on population of the communities served by the provider's headend, which will likely be shared by all communities served by that headend. PEG support funding
is grandfathered until the existing franchise expires or January
1, 2012 – whichever comes first. Customer
Service – The Director of Commerce has the authority to enforce
a few, specifically enumerated customer service standards. Although
local governments have no enforcement authority whatsoever, the bill
provides that video service providers shall assist local governments
in addressing subscriber complaints. Emergency Alert
– No later than 6 months from the effective date of its video
service authorization a video service provider must carry emergency
interrupt service announcements transmitted by local television
broadcasters (EAS). Local governments may no longer require
operators to provide local emergency override of emergency
announcements by local officials. Build-out/Redlining – SB 117 prohibits local governments from requiring operators to build-out and provide service to the entire community, so operators are free to “cherry-pick” the areas they wish to serve. The bill contains only very limited build-out and anti-redlining provisions, with many affirmative defenses. Only the Director of Commerce has authority to enforce these requirements. During its journey through the Senate and House, a coalition of local government and education advocates was able to secure some improvements in the final version of SB 117 over SB 117 as introduced. These improvements include: the limited competition trigger for incumbent opt-out; the ability to include advertising revenues in gross revenue for purposes of calculating franchise fees if specified by ordinance or resolution (the original version of the bill banned franchise fees on any non-subscriber revenues); limited grandfathering provisions for PEG Channels; PEG support funding; PEG transmission/connectivity to Video Service Provider; Institutional Network obligations; obligation of Video Service Provider to accept programming in any format that complies with NTSC standards in effect on effective date of SB 117; removal of proposed changes to RC Chapter 4939 further infringing local government’s control of the public right-of-way. Although the bill is clearly not a positive development for most local governments, how the details of SB 117 will play out over the next few months and years remains to be seen. Depending on the expiration of your current cable franchise, the requirements of that agreement, an incumbent's decision to opt-out, and/or AT&T’s interest in entering the video service market in your community, sooner or later you will be receiving notification from your incumbent operator and/or a new entrant about an SB 117-related issue. For more information on the impact of SB117, please contact Bill Hanna, Todd Hunt or Janet Alter:
Walter & Haverfield LLP The information in this newsletter is a summary of often complex legal issues and may not cover all the 'fine points' related to a specific situation or court jurisdiction. Accordingly, it is not intended to be legal advice, which should always be obtained in consultation with an attorney. If you do not wish to receive future newsletters reply to this email and type "unsubscribe" in the subject line. |
||||||||||||