Questionably Offensive Trademarks Cleared for U.S. Registration

On June 19, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the disparagement clause violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. This decision emanates from the case involving the lead singer of the rock group called "The Slants" who sought federal registration of the mark "THE SLANTS". The registration was originally denied by the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) because the name was determined to be offensive to particular ethnic groups that have been described as having slant-eyes. [More]

Questionably Offensive Trademarks Cleared for U.S. Registration

On June 19, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the disparagement clause violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. This decision emanates from the case involving the lead singer of the rock group called "The Slants" who sought federal registration of the mark "THE SLANTS". The registration was originally denied by the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) because the name was determined to be offensive to particular ethnic groups that have been described as having slant-eyes. [More]

Protect your creative assets - here and abroad

In an article published by Crain's Cleveland Business on February 18, 2017 and titled, "Protect your creative assets - here and abroad," D. Peter Hochberg maintained that, unless a company's creative assets are protected with registered trademarks, it could be ripped off by it competitors or it may lose its marketing edge. [More]

Protecting Trademarks in the U.S. and Abroad - Registration is easy and inexpensive; provides numerous benefits

If your business has a trademark but hasn't registered it, one of your most valuable assets could be at risk. A key challenge is that many businesses that use trademarks are not even aware that they can and should be registered. [More]